Skip to main content

Back in the Office from ASAE Annual Meeting

I got back from Chicago yesterday around noon, and headed straight back into the office. Lots to catch up on. In fact, as I type this in the office today, I turn around this afternoon and head up a Leadership Conference for some of our members up in Bethesda. I am excited for next week, when I can actually go through all my notes and figure out how I can implement some of the ideas that the sessions sparked. I think I have a manageable amount coming out of Annual Meeting, which is less than the Great Ideas conference, but might be easier to deal with.

Which brings me to this question. Would you rather have a boatload of ideas and only be able to act on a few, or have a few ideas where you can act on all of them?

Comments

Tony Rossell said…
I will take quantity of ideas. If you have a whole lot of options in your mind, then hopefully the right one will come to the top when you need it. I have always liked this quote:

“Most companies [or non-profits] would be better off if they made fewer billion-dollar bets and a whole lot more $10,000 or $20,000 bets – some of which will, in time, justify more substantial commitments. They should steer clear of grand, imperial strategies and devote themselves instead to launching a swarm of low-risk experiments.”

Gary Hamel and Lisa Valikangas, “The Quest for Resilience”

Do you agree? Tony
August 15, 2007 at 1:42 PM
Matt Baehr said…
I am with you Tony. I like lots of ideas. Throw them all against the wall and see what sticks. You learn just as much (sometimes more) from trying and failing. Don't limit yourself to the ones you think will work.
August 15, 2007 at 1:52 PM
Becky Granger said…
I vote lots...that way you can act on the easy ones quickly but keep thinking about the others until it's a good time.
August 16, 2007 at 10:08 AM
David M. Patt, CAE said…
The more ideas the better. That way you'll have plenty of choices and are more likely to act on the best ones.
August 16, 2007 at 11:16 PM
Ben Martin, CAE said…
I will also go with quantity. Frans Johanssen, author of The Medici Effect says, "the best way to have a great idea is to have a lot of ideas," or something like that. There's no way to tell what will or won't work in today's environment.
August 18, 2007 at 10:09 AM
Maddie Grant said…
I agree too! I still have a whole pile of ideas from last year's Technology conference that are just waiting for the right moment for me to present them. I find that often my members are a little bit behind the pace and I need to let the pot simmer a bit before they taste just right - to everyone. I also think there are many ideas that can be combined at the right times to create a whole wave of new thinking - and that works better if we can show our members a whole menu of possibilities. (Hmmm - can you tell I have not had lunch yet?)
August 20, 2007 at 2:15 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

10 Thoughts on #ASAE10

Ok, so I could have spelled out the title, but chose the hashtag - #asae10. Supposedly there were over 8,000 tweets with the hashtag, but probably countless more direct messages of messages that left out the hashtag but were conference related. Two years ago, we were using twitter as a backchannel to talk about speakers. Now, over 800 people sent conference related tweets. If you aren't on Twitter, you are already late to the party. Anyway, on with the post... In no particular order, my thoughts on this years ASAE Annual Conference: 1. LA was a good venue. Lots to do. Hotels close by. Only downside was the rooms were a bit of a hike. 2. I missed Sunday because of family obligations. That really put me behind the 8 ball. Since I led a session, that meant I only got to go to 3 true sessions. Sorry, I don't count Joy Behar and the closing session. Although Marshall Goldsmith was good, I probably wouldn't have gone to see that speech as a Learning Lab. 3. Based on #
11 comments
Read more

Sunk Costs, Marginal Costs and Economics

When I was in college, I hated Economics. Then, several years later, I found myself teaching undergrad Econ and learned an appreciation for it. Now today, I have an even bigger appreciation for it. I have also noticed that not enough people have a solid grasp of some basic econ concepts that can be applied to everyday life. Two of these are cost related. Here are some basic definitions from The Economist website : Sunk Costs - When what is done cannot be undone. Sunk costs are costs that have been incurred and cannot be reversed, for example, spending on ADVERTISING or researching a product idea. They can be a barrier to entry. If potential entrants would have to incur similar costs, which would not be recoverable if the entry failed, they may be scared off. Marginal Costs - The difference made by one extra unit of something. Marginal revenue is the extra revenue earned by selling one more unit of something. The marginal cost (or whatever) can be very different from the AVERAGE c
1 comment
Read more

Do you want your association to be Walmart?

Earlier this week, I had a small Twitter discussion with Kevin Holland ( @associationinc ) regarding aggregation as a value proposition. @associationinc - Deciding your role is to aggregate other people's value is like George Costanza wearing sweatpants. "You're telling the world, 'I give up.'" @cardcat - Interesting comment about aggregating. Don't you think it is a viable option for a small association who can't afford it? @associationinc - Nothng wrong with aggregating content as long as you don't perceive it to be your value proposition. There's no real future in it. @cardcat - Don't think it is THE value proposition, but I think it could be A value to members, a big value. @associationinc - A big value is something you offer that nobody else can or that u can do better. Aggregating content is easy, there4 unsustainable. @cardcat - True, it isn't sustainable. But I almost think if you don't act as an aggregator, you risk folks
3 comments
Read more