Skip to main content

More from Shirky

Ok, so it looks like I will be posting my thoughts fairly frequently when it comes to Shirky's book. Here is my latest nugget:

In particular, when a profession has been created as a result of some scarcity, as with librarians or television programmers, the professionals are often the last ones to see it when that scarcity goes away. It is easier to understand that you face competition then obsolesence.


This is talking more about a profession, but could be about associations too? Any thoughts?

Comments

Ben Martin, CAE said…
Ah, now you're beginning to see where I'm coming from. You don't want to be the last one to see that ridiculously easy group forming is an attack on what many association execs do all day long!
Ben Martin, CAE said…
subbing to comments. sorry.
Greg Fine said…
Much of the conversation on this blog, and Shirky's book is around the concept, and fear, that self-forming groups, and Ben I totally agree with your post on this, are going to put associations out of business.

My question...why shouldn't some associations go out of business? The National Tie Association just folded. It was time, it wasn't becuase thier members could self form, it was becuase they were no longer relevant.

What social media is doing, in my very humble opion, is hastening the death of some organizations that need to die.

Those associations that are revelant to their members, all of them, will, I believe, not only survive, but thrive.

The Arthur Brooks study bears that out.

Also, why does it have to be an all of nothing equation? Take YAP for instance. This is a self forming group of predomiately ASAE members. Is this group going to put ASAE out of business? No, in fact, it may help strengthen a connection to ASAE that helped identify the like minded individuals that created YAP.

I strongly believe that the associations that remain relevant to their memebers will thrive. But hasn't that always been the case?

At Digital Now, Paul Rand, CEO of Zocalo, a powerhouse in Word of Mouth Marketing, cautioned an audience of association execs to not get too wrapped in the platform that is delivering the conversion, and pay attention and support the conversation itself.

Self-forming groups occur when there is no one doing that. Shirky's book is full of examples where this was the case.

This has been a great conversation to follow and I look forward to seeing where it goes from here.
Lisa Junker said…
Thanks so much for posting this quote, Matt! I need to read this book.

What the quote immediately made me think of wasn't the association profession so much as the professions many associations represent. I've worked at associations before where the volunteer leadership seemed to embrace the scarcity model, and didn't want to support efforts to recruit newer or younger people to the profession: "Why should we pay to help new professionals come along and take our jobs?" It can be a real challenge to help members entrenched in the scarcity model to understand that it won't work forever and that they need to seek a new model out ...

Popular posts from this blog

10 Thoughts on #ASAE10

Ok, so I could have spelled out the title, but chose the hashtag - #asae10. Supposedly there were over 8,000 tweets with the hashtag, but probably countless more direct messages of messages that left out the hashtag but were conference related. Two years ago, we were using twitter as a backchannel to talk about speakers. Now, over 800 people sent conference related tweets. If you aren't on Twitter, you are already late to the party. Anyway, on with the post... In no particular order, my thoughts on this years ASAE Annual Conference: 1. LA was a good venue. Lots to do. Hotels close by. Only downside was the rooms were a bit of a hike. 2. I missed Sunday because of family obligations. That really put me behind the 8 ball. Since I led a session, that meant I only got to go to 3 true sessions. Sorry, I don't count Joy Behar and the closing session. Although Marshall Goldsmith was good, I probably wouldn't have gone to see that speech as a Learning Lab. 3. Based on #...

The Whole Cook Source Flap

I am going to give my 2 cents on this whole Cook Source thing. If you don't know what I am talking about, you can read more here and here . I am sure a few folks are going to take umbrage with my stance, but that is bound to happen. So a magazine found a blog post, liked it, printed it while giving credit to the author. The author hears about it, and gets pissed? She wants printed apologies and a donation made, because she got published? What am I missing here? Who wouldn't want their stuff to be published while being credited? Isn't that one of the main tenants of blogging, to be linked to? Sure, the response from the editor was one of the dumbest things ever written and she handled it tremendously bad. However, I am just floored that this person is pissed off. True, the internet is not public domain. However, every college paper in the world has citations. And all those students didn't contact the author to make sure they can use it. And every blog post ...

Where do you draw the line on social media?

I try to keep up. I have a feed reader . I blog . I comment on other people's blogs. I tweet . I have multiple websites . I have accounts on Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn and others. But you have to draw the line somewhere. I wrote earlier about being app'd out . I still feel that way. But each day I feel farther behind. Maybe not behind, but not necessarily maximizing potential. I don't Digg. I don't StumbleUpon. OK, maybe I do like once a month if I have some spare time. But I know I am missing out on a lot of cool things. I usually check out other people's links to cool tools or the next new thing. But right now, I feel like I am in the Dip . Any suggestions on how to get out?