Skip to main content

Testing Google TV Ads

If you haven't heard, you can now buy TV ads using the Google Adwords platform. That's right, regular old TV spots, bidding just like you do for keywords. (I highly recommend watching the video linked above)

I am doing my own test. I do some freelance web design work, so I created an ad for that, and am trying to get it on TV. My goal was to do this as quick and cheap as possible, while still producing something worthwhile. Here is the blow by blow.

1. Creating the ad
I went stupid simple. I just used still shots with my voice recorded over them using the mic in a webcam. Not ideal. If I really wanted to put some time and effort into this, I would have used a much better sound setup. I used Adobe's Visual Communicator product (originally created by Serious Magic). I really like this tool. You can make cool video very simply with it.

With Google TV ads, you can have various length ads (15, 30, 60, etc) but they have to be exact. I tried uploading one that was like 29.17 and Google told me I couldn't upload. I then had to find a free program to try to make the video exact. I found Pinnacle's VideoSpin that allowed me to cut right to the thousandth of a second. It didn't give me frame numbers, but it worked nonetheless.

2. Setting up the Campaign
This part is easy. Just like adwords, you set your CPM bid, your daily spend limits and length of campaign. You have to upload your video and then choose where you want it to run. There are a boatload of options here. For my test, I am choosing cheap. I am looking to run on Bloomberg Business TV and The Weather Channel, Tuesday and Wednesday between Midnight at 7am. According to the Google Estimator, with my bid of $1 CPM, my spot should air 13 times, with 245k unique impressions and 455k impressions for $300 (which is my cap).

Google told me that I am unlikely to run on Bloomberg between 5-7am because my bid it too low, but I should be fine from 12-5 and on the Weather Channel. I also saw my estimated traffic change while on the site and selecting my targets.

I will let you know how it goes!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

10 Thoughts on #ASAE10

Ok, so I could have spelled out the title, but chose the hashtag - #asae10. Supposedly there were over 8,000 tweets with the hashtag, but probably countless more direct messages of messages that left out the hashtag but were conference related. Two years ago, we were using twitter as a backchannel to talk about speakers. Now, over 800 people sent conference related tweets. If you aren't on Twitter, you are already late to the party. Anyway, on with the post... In no particular order, my thoughts on this years ASAE Annual Conference: 1. LA was a good venue. Lots to do. Hotels close by. Only downside was the rooms were a bit of a hike. 2. I missed Sunday because of family obligations. That really put me behind the 8 ball. Since I led a session, that meant I only got to go to 3 true sessions. Sorry, I don't count Joy Behar and the closing session. Although Marshall Goldsmith was good, I probably wouldn't have gone to see that speech as a Learning Lab. 3. Based on #...

The Whole Cook Source Flap

I am going to give my 2 cents on this whole Cook Source thing. If you don't know what I am talking about, you can read more here and here . I am sure a few folks are going to take umbrage with my stance, but that is bound to happen. So a magazine found a blog post, liked it, printed it while giving credit to the author. The author hears about it, and gets pissed? She wants printed apologies and a donation made, because she got published? What am I missing here? Who wouldn't want their stuff to be published while being credited? Isn't that one of the main tenants of blogging, to be linked to? Sure, the response from the editor was one of the dumbest things ever written and she handled it tremendously bad. However, I am just floored that this person is pissed off. True, the internet is not public domain. However, every college paper in the world has citations. And all those students didn't contact the author to make sure they can use it. And every blog post ...

Generational Issues

The latest Acronym post about Generational Issues got me thinking. I thought about writing a comment, but figured this deserved its own post. I am going to take the contrarian route, maybe spark some discussion. Feel free to tell me I am wrong, or maybe agree with me (as everyone should). Aren't we making too big a deal about the generational differences? Don't things evolve with the times? As staff turns over and new ideas are introduced, don't they inherently reflect the attitudes and ideas of their particular group? I know that you want to be proactive and you have to have a plan for the future to make sure you are still viable, but will you really need to change your entire business model? I know that there will be some extreme cases where that will be true as certain products become obsolete, but in most cases it won't. It is nice to generalize and stereotypes exist for a reason. But not every group is going to change how they do business just because Gen X differ...