Skip to main content

The Nudge

Dan and Chip Heath write a great article in the May issue of Fast Company. It is about changing people's opinions with just a small nudge, or change in the way things are normally done. One example they give is that in Austria, you are automatically an organ donor unless you opt out. Therefore, 99% of residents are donors. When you have to opt in, only 12% of residents of Germany are donors.

Could you make renewals automatic? Once you sign up, we will automatically charge your credit card each year unless you opt out? Are there laws against that? Would you get a big backlash? I know credit card companies try to do that with their "insurance" plans in you lose your job, etc.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Yes, you need to check the legalities of that.

By the way, I don't select automatic renewals when I sign up for anything. When the term is up I want to be asked again.

I think opt-out is presumtuous and takes advantage of people who are either uninformed or inattentive.

You don't have to persuade people to renew when their membership expires, simply inform them it is time to renew.
Matt Baehr said…
Actually, I am with you David. I just wanted to throw it out there.

However, even though it may take advantage of the uninformed, those may become informed by being automatically renewed.
Anonymous said…
Matt,

When I was working in the publishing world for a number of years credit card automatic renewal was the panacea. Every publisher in the world thought people would flock to it and it would make the world a better place. As we all tested it no one was real successful. There were numerous issues including lower response, bad credit cards, etc, etc. Bottom line was I don't think that people wanted you to sit on their credit card info and just zap them over and over again.

What many companies went to was what we call automatic billing. It is really semantics but what publishers were doing was getting subscribers to sign up for an auto bill program. What this meant is that you were giving written consent (not legally enforceable of course)that you were going to renew for the foreseeable future and that the publisher could invoice you and expect payment. Instead of sending a "renewal" to you they would send a "bill" to you stating that you had signed up for this program and your payment was now due. It did work in some cases and their are several publishers that are now using it as part of their regular process.

Personally I think that associations are different than publishers. Associations need to show their members the value of membership on a consistent basis so that renewal is a no-brainer. If all were able to do that we wouldn't have to worry about hoping that some folks gave us credit card numbers that we could just hit regularly and hope that even some of those that wanted to drop their membership were just too lazy to figure out how to get us to stop charging their cards.

Popular posts from this blog

10 Thoughts on #ASAE10

Ok, so I could have spelled out the title, but chose the hashtag - #asae10. Supposedly there were over 8,000 tweets with the hashtag, but probably countless more direct messages of messages that left out the hashtag but were conference related. Two years ago, we were using twitter as a backchannel to talk about speakers. Now, over 800 people sent conference related tweets. If you aren't on Twitter, you are already late to the party. Anyway, on with the post... In no particular order, my thoughts on this years ASAE Annual Conference: 1. LA was a good venue. Lots to do. Hotels close by. Only downside was the rooms were a bit of a hike. 2. I missed Sunday because of family obligations. That really put me behind the 8 ball. Since I led a session, that meant I only got to go to 3 true sessions. Sorry, I don't count Joy Behar and the closing session. Although Marshall Goldsmith was good, I probably wouldn't have gone to see that speech as a Learning Lab. 3. Based on #...

The Whole Cook Source Flap

I am going to give my 2 cents on this whole Cook Source thing. If you don't know what I am talking about, you can read more here and here . I am sure a few folks are going to take umbrage with my stance, but that is bound to happen. So a magazine found a blog post, liked it, printed it while giving credit to the author. The author hears about it, and gets pissed? She wants printed apologies and a donation made, because she got published? What am I missing here? Who wouldn't want their stuff to be published while being credited? Isn't that one of the main tenants of blogging, to be linked to? Sure, the response from the editor was one of the dumbest things ever written and she handled it tremendously bad. However, I am just floored that this person is pissed off. True, the internet is not public domain. However, every college paper in the world has citations. And all those students didn't contact the author to make sure they can use it. And every blog post ...

Read This Post, If It's the Last Thing You Do

Don't you wish all your blog posts could have that title, and the corresponding effect of everyone who sees it follows through? As I was digging through my Google Reader this morning, I realized how much I rely on the title (and first sentence or part of the first sentence) to help me decide whether or not to read more of the post. I have boatloads of unread posts in my reader and just can't get fully read each one. Granted, I have probably already read a number of them because I clicked through to it when a trusted source tweeted about the post. However, I know I am missing good content because the title and first sentence don't grab me or tell me what the post is really about. Therefore, I am making a resolution to do better with my title and first few words to make it better for my readers. In addition, if you have any tips on Blog Post Title creation, please share. I am all ears! PS - this is also a test to see if my page view numbers increase at all with this tit...